GNOME has plans, EU investigates OpenAI for GDPR violations, Ubuntu Real Time
S02:E22

GNOME has plans, EU investigates OpenAI for GDPR violations, Ubuntu Real Time

Episode description

👏 Support the show here: 👏

Patreon supporters get the daily Linux & Open Source audio show!

https://www.patreon.com/thelinuxexperiment

https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/thelinuxexp

https://liberapay.com/TheLinuxExperiment/

👕 Buy TLE Merch: 👕

https://the-linux-experiment.creator-spring.com/

📹 Watch Linux videos: 📹

https://www.youtube.com/thelinuxexperiment

🎙️ Leave your feedback here: 🎙️

https://podcast.thelinuxexp.com


00:00 Intro

01:40 Unknown trouble at the GNOME foundation

https://thisweek.gnome.org/posts/2024/05/twig-149/ https://foundation.gnome.org/2024/05/31/gnome-development-initiative-update/

09:25 EU looks into AI tools GDPR potential violations

https://www.techradar.com/computing/cyber-security/eu-chatgpt-taskforce-a-road-to-gdpr-enforcement-on-ai

14:28 F-Droid, micro G and /e/ band together

https://linuxiac.com/mobifree-challenging-the-tech-giants/

17:32 AWS is strangling some Fedora mirrors

http://smoogespace.blogspot.com/2024/05/where-did-5-million-epel-7-systems-come.html

20:02 Fedora installer delayed again

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Anaconda-Web-UI-Fedora-42

23:35 Internet archive & wayback machine being targeted by DDOs

https://blog.archive.org/2024/05/28/internet-archive-and-the-wayback-machine-under-ddos-cyber-attack/

26:13 WSL gets graphical settings

https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2024/05/wsl-gui-settings-apps-coming-soon

28:58 Real Time Ubuntu is now available

https://linuxiac.com/ubuntu-24-04-now-offers-a-real-time-kernel-but-there-is-a-catch/

30:55 RavynOS tries to run macOS apps on BSD

https://ravynos.com/

34:23 Rhino Linux is back with a rolling Ubuntu

https://rhinolinux.org/news-13.html

37:30 Steam Deck now has 15 000 games

https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2024/05/steam-deck-hits-15000-games-rated-playable-and-verified/

41:19 Outro

Download transcript (.srt)
1:00:00

Hey everyone and welcome back to your

1:00:02

weekly Linux and open source news show

1:00:05

I'm your host Nick and this is a podcast

1:00:07

where we discuss everything that happened

1:00:09

in the Linux open source privacy and

1:00:12

Open web spaces so for this week

1:00:15

We have some unknown trouble at the GNOME

1:00:18

foundation that might very well put in

1:00:21

danger all the projects

1:00:22

Or at least some of the projects that

1:00:24

they've been working on with the funding

1:00:26

of the sovereign tech fund

1:00:28

We've got the EU looking into GDPR

1:00:32

Violations or potential

1:00:33

violations made by AI tools

1:00:35

We've got f-droid micro G

1:00:38

and the slash e Android ROM

1:00:40

Bending together for a new initiative to

1:00:43

try and make well mobile and the mobile

1:00:46

space a little bit more ethical

1:00:48

We've got some news about Fedora. We've

1:00:50

got some news about the Internet archive

1:00:52

being targeted by DDoS attacks

1:00:55

We've got some distro releases

1:00:57

We've got some gaming news and as always

1:00:59

if you want to dive

1:01:00

deeper into any of the topics

1:01:02

I'll talk about here all the

1:01:04

links are in the show notes

1:01:05

And if you want me to keep making this

1:01:07

show and you want to support it

1:01:09

They are links in the

1:01:10

show notes just as well

1:01:11

And if you become a patreon member you

1:01:14

will get a daily version of this show

1:01:16

from Monday to Friday

1:01:17

So if you don't want to wait for the end

1:01:19

of the week to get all the

1:01:20

news and get a little bit more

1:01:22

Topics because there are some things I

1:01:24

just cut out of this podcast

1:01:26

So it's not too long if you want all that

1:01:28

then you can just become a patreon

1:01:30

It starts at $1 per month and you will

1:01:32

help me make this show

1:01:34

live on so thanks for

1:01:36

Listening to this little self-promotion

1:01:37

and now let's get into it

1:01:40

So first let's talk about GNOME. You

1:01:43

probably know they received a like 1

1:01:45

million euro grand from an organization

1:01:48

That is based in Germany. That's called

1:01:49

the sovereign tech fund

1:01:51

They have to use these funds specifically

1:01:54

to work on specific projects

1:01:56

They agreed upon when receiving the grant

1:01:59

and they've been doing a lot of that.

1:02:01

There's the global

1:02:01

keyboard shortcuts portal

1:02:03

There's home encryption. There's a new

1:02:06

accessibility framework.

1:02:07

There's better wayland support

1:02:08

There's a lot of stuff being included in

1:02:11

here, but apparently

1:02:12

they've hit a snag with this

1:02:14

That's what they call a major issue on

1:02:17

the GNOME Foundation side

1:02:19

But they did not give

1:02:21

any more details yet

1:02:22

They said they wanted to resolve that

1:02:24

problem before it impacts coordination of

1:02:28

those sovereign tech fund projects

1:02:30

But they also said that if they could not

1:02:33

solve that major issue

1:02:34

It might affect some parts of the project

1:02:37

and make work on them basically hard

1:02:40

I wish they had been

1:02:42

clearer about what is happening

1:02:43

It would have been nice to

1:02:45

know what the problem is exactly

1:02:47

Did they use some of those funds to work

1:02:49

on something else?

1:02:50

Did the GNOME Foundation

1:02:52

misattribute certain elements of that

1:02:54

fund or maybe did they not sign the

1:02:56

correct paperwork or

1:02:58

forgot to do something?

1:02:59

I'm not sure maybe the foundation was not

1:03:01

eligible for this grant because it's from

1:03:03

a German thing and the GNOME Foundation

1:03:06

Is not German

1:03:07

I don't know but I wish they had

1:03:08

explained because it would make it way

1:03:10

easier to potentially offer

1:03:11

some help or just to know if

1:03:13

The risk is high or not for the various

1:03:16

projects that are being worked on which

1:03:19

are really really nice

1:03:20

It would be a shame if those projects

1:03:23

could not come to fruition or

1:03:25

just were not funded anymore

1:03:27

Because they are things that

1:03:29

will advance GNOME immensely

1:03:30

now they are still making some progress

1:03:33

while they're trying to

1:03:34

resolve that thing and

1:03:36

Notably one thing that I missed is that

1:03:37

they've worked on

1:03:38

adding GTK CSS variables

1:03:41

Meaning that certain colors in GTK apps

1:03:44

and in the Advaita theme could be changed

1:03:47

through variables by developers

1:03:49

Which is interesting if a developer wants

1:03:51

to have a specific

1:03:52

accent color in their app

1:03:54

Which is not the accent color the user

1:03:56

defined or if they want to have specific

1:03:58

Contrast and color tones in their

1:04:00

application, but it's also useful for

1:04:02

potentially supporting this pesky little

1:04:05

accent color standard

1:04:06

that has been

1:04:07

implemented by KDE by I think

1:04:10

Cinnamon I think Matei has it as well

1:04:13

I think elementary OS has it as well

1:04:15

basically the only major holdout is GNOME

1:04:18

They don't support this accent color

1:04:20

standard and so maybe this

1:04:22

work could be helpful for that

1:04:24

I don't know if that's what they're going

1:04:25

to end up using it for because they just

1:04:28

never call it anything

1:04:30

Along those terms they never mention

1:04:32

accent colors in there

1:04:33

But using variables to define certain

1:04:35

colors in your theme is generally used to

1:04:38

let people change the colors

1:04:39

And if app developers can do it. There's

1:04:42

no reason why we couldn't also do it

1:04:44

through GNOME settings

1:04:45

They're also working on a

1:04:46

new installer for GNOME OS

1:04:49

Something that I feel might be the

1:04:51

inkling that this GNOME

1:04:53

OS could at some point

1:04:55

become more than just a test distro for

1:04:57

developers and

1:04:58

something users might actually

1:05:00

Want to run because why would you focus

1:05:03

on developing a brand new installer?

1:05:05

If the distro you're offering is just

1:05:08

meant for developers and for testing

1:05:10

It would feel a bit weird to have all

1:05:13

that extra work being invested in just

1:05:15

the test platform where you could just

1:05:17

Use column RS or anything

1:05:18

else that has all the features

1:05:20

Any developer will be able to accommodate

1:05:22

that and they really won't need something

1:05:25

super custom if you really need

1:05:27

Certain custom options in your installer

1:05:29

you can add them to existing ones

1:05:31

So developing a brand new installer feels

1:05:33

like maybe maybe it's a move

1:05:35

Towards making GNOME OS a more normal

1:05:39

distribution that

1:05:40

people could actually use

1:05:41

Again, I do not know it's just pure

1:05:43

speculation here now

1:05:45

I hope the major issue that they

1:05:47

identified with the GNOME

1:05:48

foundation can be resolved

1:05:50

Everything that has been started thanks

1:05:52

to the sovereign tech fund grant is super

1:05:54

important to push GNOME forward

1:05:56

And it would really be disheartening if

1:05:58

anything could jeopardize

1:06:00

the delivery of this project

1:06:01

So hopefully they can resolve that issue

1:06:04

and tell us a bit more about it. So we

1:06:06

know like what's happening

1:06:09

Okay, and so I'm recording this exact

1:06:12

segment the day after

1:06:14

Recording the podcast and we had some

1:06:16

more information about the potential

1:06:18

issues that GNOME is facing

1:06:20

They didn't tell us

1:06:22

exactly what is happening

1:06:23

But they did post an update right as I

1:06:26

was recording the news video this morning

1:06:28

to confirm that things are now solved

1:06:31

They did not explain what the issue was

1:06:33

but work will apparently be able to

1:06:35

continue and GNOME will even

1:06:37

Expand its various initiatives to do more

1:06:40

work along the lines of what they're

1:06:42

doing with the sovereign tech fund

1:06:44

They actually hired a brand new program

1:06:46

manager to handle all of these projects

1:06:49

and handle communication

1:06:50

Which kind of makes me think that maybe

1:06:53

the major issue was that

1:06:54

everyone started working on their

1:06:57

Projects for the STF, but no one really

1:06:59

communicated any

1:07:01

progress to the STF directly

1:07:03

Maybe no one answered their questions or

1:07:05

like checked in to tell them how the

1:07:07

money was being used and

1:07:09

maybe the STF got worried

1:07:10

That hey, you know what?

1:07:11

Maybe you're swindling us of our money

1:07:13

because we don't know

1:07:13

what you're doing right now

1:07:14

This is just speculation on my part

1:07:16

I have no idea if that's the case, but

1:07:19

since they hired someone to handle this

1:07:21

maybe that's the problem

1:07:23

GNOME also seems to want to expand the

1:07:25

work being done with a process to let the

1:07:27

community give

1:07:28

suggestions for work that is needed

1:07:30

And another process for companies or

1:07:33

organizations to offer

1:07:34

grants to fund that work

1:07:36

so basically some kind of bug

1:07:38

bounty but with features and

1:07:40

Probably some kind of triage to make sure

1:07:42

that the requested features are actually

1:07:44

stuff that GNOME wants

1:07:46

to offer in their whole

1:07:48

Ecosystem I I don't see someone asking

1:07:50

for the like the minimize button back or

1:07:53

the system tray back

1:07:54

Being allowed to have funding for this

1:07:57

exact same thing the GNOME Foundation

1:07:59

applied to the open tech fund as well

1:08:01

That's an American nonprofit focused on

1:08:04

supporting projects that go for a more

1:08:06

open approach towards tech

1:08:08

So maybe this could give them a little

1:08:09

bit more funding as well

1:08:11

And the foundation will also apply for

1:08:13

more contract funding with the sovereign

1:08:15

tech fund in mid-june

1:08:17

And finally, they also are launching a

1:08:19

development fund to raise more funds from

1:08:22

the community themselves

1:08:23

To fund all of these ideas, which is nice

1:08:26

and on top of that it looks like they

1:08:28

cleaned up the books

1:08:29

They are now operating under their budget

1:08:31

and they probably

1:08:32

shouldn't have a deficit this year

1:08:33

So it looks like everything is going

1:08:35

pretty well in the end

1:08:37

Problems are being handled and GNOME

1:08:39

seems to have everything lined up to move

1:08:42

forward to get bigger

1:08:43

and to work on more things

1:08:44

We will have to wait and see if this

1:08:47

amounts to anything in a year or two

1:08:49

But it's very encouraging and it should

1:08:51

make all the people kind of mocking or

1:08:53

doubting GNOME for hiring

1:08:55

This new director called Holly Millian

1:08:58

Maybe they're gonna eat their hats now

1:09:00

because who could have guessed that

1:09:01

someone with experience

1:09:03

Finding funding and running nonprofits

1:09:05

would be a good choice to run a nonprofit

1:09:08

instead of looking at her

1:09:10

External activities of shamanism. Maybe

1:09:13

they should have looked at her resume

1:09:14

Which apparently seems to give her some

1:09:16

good notions of how to

1:09:18

make the GNOME foundation run

1:09:19

We'll see if it works in the long run,

1:09:21

but for now, I don't see anything that I

1:09:23

find distasteful at all

1:09:26

Now the EU is well known for trying to

1:09:29

regulate everything and anything

1:09:30

including big tech companies

1:09:32

Sometimes it's a hit sometimes it's a

1:09:34

miss right now. They're

1:09:36

investigating some potential

1:09:38

GDPR breaches in chat

1:09:40

GPT especially in the data

1:09:42

it's scraped off of the internet because

1:09:45

if you don't know the GDPR says that

1:09:47

before collecting any

1:09:49

data about anyone you have to

1:09:51

gather consent from that person and you

1:09:54

need to be able to prove that you

1:09:55

gathered that consent and

1:09:57

By scraping a lot and a lot of data from

1:10:00

various public websites

1:10:02

Chatter GPT definitely has grabbed some

1:10:05

personal data about certain people

1:10:06

whether they're prominent public

1:10:08

Individuals or just some public Facebook

1:10:10

profiles and they actually never got

1:10:13

consent from those people

1:10:15

Together all of this data the data

1:10:17

protection board in the EU

1:10:19

Analyzed the practices from open AI and

1:10:22

they found some problematic things in how

1:10:24

they scraped content

1:10:25

But also in the accuracy of

1:10:27

the data that chat GPT display

1:10:29

They received a lot of complaints about

1:10:32

chat GPTs hallucinations

1:10:33

And this is another problem with the GDPR

1:10:36

because the GDPR also

1:10:38

states that if you restitute any

1:10:40

information to the public about a certain

1:10:42

person or organization or anything else

1:10:44

this information needs to be factual and

1:10:48

correct and

1:10:49

Well, we all know that open AI and

1:10:51

general chat bots attend to

1:10:53

hallucinate a lot of stuff

1:10:54

That never actually happened or

1:10:56

completely misinterpret

1:10:57

certain articles and phrases

1:11:00

attributing quotes citations desires and

1:11:02

phrases or acts to people or companies

1:11:06

that they indeed never

1:11:07

Actually did they're just flat-out

1:11:09

inventing some stories now this

1:11:12

investigation is just starting but it's

1:11:14

an interesting angle

1:11:15

It's not looking at hey, are they

1:11:17

infringing on copyright

1:11:18

by scraping this data?

1:11:20

It's not oh, is it a misinformation if

1:11:22

they publish this? It's not oh should

1:11:24

they respect licenses on

1:11:26

the things that they use?

1:11:27

It's well, they're gathering a lot of

1:11:29

personal data by accident or not

1:11:31

And yeah, it needs to be regulated as

1:11:34

well, which I think

1:11:35

is an interesting angle

1:11:36

We never really saw about AI so this

1:11:39

investigation already surfaced a few

1:11:41

things first. It's that consent thing

1:11:44

Obviously sometimes

1:11:46

Companies in the EU will not be able to

1:11:48

prove that they gathered consent for a

1:11:50

reason or not or another

1:11:51

But there is another use case that lets

1:11:53

companies gather that

1:11:54

data without consent

1:11:56

And that's when they can rely on a

1:11:58

legitimate interest for the

1:12:00

company to gather that data

1:12:02

And that's what is being contested here a

1:12:05

privacy expert saying seems to think that

1:12:07

basically here open AI has no

1:12:10

legitimate interest to gather this data

1:12:12

because well gathering data on public

1:12:15

profiles on Facebook is not

1:12:17

what is going to make your

1:12:18

Chatbot better and the GDPR stipulates

1:12:21

that companies who use that legitimate

1:12:24

interest to justify the

1:12:25

fact they're gathering

1:12:26

Personal information without consent.

1:12:28

They should make all that information

1:12:30

they gathered publicly available

1:12:32

So everyone can check that they indeed

1:12:35

gathered information that is legitimate

1:12:37

and related to what they're trying to do

1:12:40

Open AI does not publish any of their

1:12:42

data set or anything

1:12:44

they trained on meaning

1:12:45

It's all a black box and you can only

1:12:47

infer what they've used in terms of data

1:12:49

by the results and the

1:12:50

information it just spits back

1:12:52

Which leads you to sort of guess where it

1:12:55

could have gotten that information

1:12:57

And that second issue is

1:12:59

obviously those hallucinations

1:13:00

We talked about the GDPR stipulates that

1:13:02

all information you can get about EU

1:13:05

citizens should be accurate

1:13:07

So when you ask a question to chat GPT

1:13:09

about a specific individual

1:13:11

It shouldn't tell you things that it

1:13:12

imagined and as I said

1:13:14

We all know that it tends to imagine a

1:13:16

lot of things that never actually happen

1:13:18

So these are preliminary conclusions and

1:13:21

it ends in no fine or recommendations

1:13:24

It's just broad advice. It's just saying

1:13:26

hey just by the start

1:13:28

of this investigation

1:13:29

We have noticed that open AI should

1:13:31

implement appropriate

1:13:32

measures and safeguards

1:13:34

This could mean anything and

1:13:36

everything at the same time

1:13:37

It leaves open AI completely free to

1:13:39

interpret that however

1:13:40

they want and to fix anything

1:13:42

But maybe later down the line they will

1:13:45

find more concrete stuff

1:13:46

that open AI needs to do

1:13:48

I hope they can do that

1:13:50

So these tools can start operating in a

1:13:52

more ethical and

1:13:54

respectful manner in the future

1:13:55

We are being force fed these tools. Some

1:13:58

people are very happy to have them

1:13:59

Some people don't want them but basically

1:14:01

they are happening

1:14:02

whether we like them or not

1:14:04

We are going to see those tools

1:14:06

everywhere at some point

1:14:07

So it would be nice if they were at least

1:14:10

private and ethical from the get-go

1:14:13

Instead of having to wait for them to

1:14:15

become gigantic before acting just like

1:14:18

what we did with the giant tech companies

1:14:20

We have today

1:14:20

We only started regulating them when they

1:14:23

were way too big to really regulate if we

1:14:25

can avoid doing that same

1:14:26

mistake with AI companies

1:14:28

It would be great

1:14:31

Now this week we also saw an interesting

1:14:33

group or initiative

1:14:35

forming for mobile devices

1:14:37

It's called Moby free and

1:14:39

it includes the e foundation

1:14:40

They are the ones making the slash e

1:14:43

Android ROM that I

1:14:44

covered a bit on the channel

1:14:45

It's a de-googled ROM with their own

1:14:48

custom launchers forks of AOSP apps or

1:14:51

entirely open source applications

1:14:52

And they are not just shipping a package

1:14:55

of already available apps

1:14:56

They're actually improving

1:14:57

the design so it looks coherent

1:14:59

They're offering a space in the next

1:15:01

cloud instance for free so you can store

1:15:03

your stuff and create a free account that

1:15:04

you have control over

1:15:05

Not another company stuff like that. So

1:15:07

they're trying to push the privacy and

1:15:10

ethical side of Android basically

1:15:13

I talked about them on the channel go

1:15:14

check out those videos if you want

1:15:16

But this initiative also regroups micro G

1:15:19

Which is the open source implementation

1:15:21

of the Google services which lets you use

1:15:24

certain Google apps and applications

1:15:26

That depend on Google services on

1:15:28

de-googled Android ROMs. You never make a

1:15:31

real call to Google with those things

1:15:33

It also includes fDroid which is the open

1:15:36

source app store for open source apps

1:15:38

And there are a bunch of other projects

1:15:40

here. It's sponsored by

1:15:41

the European Commission

1:15:43

So the EU and the end goal is to have a

1:15:46

more open more

1:15:47

private and more sustainable

1:15:49

Ecosystem in the mobile software sector

1:15:51

without all the current privacy

1:15:53

violations without

1:15:54

user lock-in that prevents

1:15:56

You from moving from

1:15:57

either Android to something else

1:15:59

But even sometimes from a Android

1:16:01

manufacturer to another one and without

1:16:03

forcing hardware changes

1:16:04

through software obsolescence

1:16:06

Now they also

1:16:07

advocate for open source code

1:16:09

Obviously because all of these projects

1:16:10

are open source and their plan of action

1:16:12

is to first start gathering

1:16:15

Information about what people would like

1:16:17

to see change in the mobile sector by

1:16:20

conducting some workshops

1:16:21

and some user focus groups

1:16:22

And then to use that feedback to improve

1:16:25

the slash e Android ROM improve the

1:16:27

various app stores

1:16:28

improve messaging tools

1:16:29

Maps and more to actually have well

1:16:32

something that can compete and can

1:16:34

support all the applications people need

1:16:37

It is a very interesting project to me

1:16:39

It probably will not amount to a lot of

1:16:42

people moving away from big tech

1:16:44

platforms and services

1:16:46

Unless at some point it gets a strong

1:16:48

push by the EU with a

1:16:50

specific carrier or whatever

1:16:52

Not seeing that happening. That's not

1:16:54

what the EU does generally

1:16:55

But if they do manage to get a bit of EU

1:16:58

funding if they can manage to

1:16:59

make sure that slash e works

1:17:01

Reliably with most apps without

1:17:03

compatibility problems due to Google

1:17:05

safety net or due to micro G not

1:17:07

supporting everything

1:17:08

That will be a net benefit for most

1:17:11

people even for people not

1:17:13

using slash e as their ROM

1:17:14

This initiative will

1:17:15

basically lift all Android ROM

1:17:18

If it actually managed to build something

1:17:20

because it's open source code and any

1:17:22

other Android ROM will be

1:17:24

able to benefit from those

1:17:25

improvements so hopefully this works and

1:17:28

I can finally go back to using a D Google

1:17:30

Android ROM on solid

1:17:31

hardware because for now

1:17:32

I'm stuck

1:17:35

Now the Fedora mirrors are apparently

1:17:37

being heavily strained by millions of

1:17:40

requests coming from

1:17:41

AWS

1:17:42

Fedora hosts the

1:17:44

mirrors for the ep el systems

1:17:46

They're called basically the extra

1:17:48

packages for enterprise Linux

1:17:50

They're sort of PPA's for red hat

1:17:53

enterprise Linux for red hat based

1:17:55

distros for sent OS and stuff like that

1:17:57

They contain software that lets you turn

1:18:00

your system to a specific use case

1:18:02

That is not necessarily the prime focus

1:18:04

of red hat enterprise Linux or sent OS

1:18:07

And they're very interesting things that

1:18:09

that a lot of people use

1:18:10

these mirrors that host the EP el

1:18:13

Repos have seen a surge

1:18:15

in traffic since March

1:18:17

2024 more than five million new systems

1:18:21

pulling packages from

1:18:22

those repos are just

1:18:23

pulling the repos for available packages

1:18:26

and it basically doubled the amount of

1:18:28

connections to those

1:18:29

repos in a few months and

1:18:31

The source is clearly identified as

1:18:34

Amazon with traffic

1:18:35

from AWS surging like crazy

1:18:38

Now fortunately the problem has been

1:18:40

reported to Amazon and some of their

1:18:42

engineers are looking at the issue

1:18:44

To try and see what

1:18:45

happened and to fix it

1:18:47

This is apparently not linked to people

1:18:50

migrating from sent OS 7 or

1:18:52

red hat enterprise Linux 7

1:18:54

Which maybe who would maybe like focus on

1:18:57

a similar distribution that would use the

1:19:00

EP el system to upgrade itself

1:19:02

That's not the case that surge would have

1:19:04

lasted way less time than what we're

1:19:08

seeing on the Fedora mirrors

1:19:09

So what would actually be nice is if tech

1:19:14

companies using those community projects

1:19:17

the all those community mirrors hosted by

1:19:20

community projects if they actually

1:19:22

Hosted those mirrors themselves or made a

1:19:24

copy of them or just offered to host them

1:19:27

on their infrastructure

1:19:29

When a giant company like Amazon is a big

1:19:32

leader in the hosting space

1:19:34

It would make sense if instead of just

1:19:37

piggybacking off of community servers

1:19:39

They could actually pay for some servers

1:19:41

for their own use because apparently

1:19:43

Amazon Linux uses those things. So yeah

1:19:46

I know Amazon contributes to the Linux

1:19:49

kernel things like that

1:19:50

But honestly hosting some mirrors for

1:19:52

those projects would

1:19:53

probably cost them nothing

1:19:54

And if they could just use their own

1:19:56

mirrors instead of the

1:19:58

community ones for their own distros

1:20:00

That would probably be best for everyone

1:20:04

And still on Fedora. It looks like the

1:20:06

new installer is being delayed again

1:20:10

They've been working on a replacement to

1:20:12

the let's be honest pretty terrible

1:20:14

Anaconda installer that Fedora currently

1:20:17

uses they've been

1:20:18

working on that for a while now

1:20:20

It was initially planned for Fedora 39.

1:20:22

It wasn't ready was pushed

1:20:24

to 40 then was pushed to 41

1:20:26

But it also won't be ready for October

1:20:28

when Fedora 41 is planned meaning that it

1:20:31

has to be pushed yet again to Fedora 42

1:20:35

Now that new installer

1:20:35

is called Anaconda Web UI

1:20:37

It does look a lot better and more

1:20:40

user-friendly than the current Anaconda

1:20:42

It's way easier to understand with a more

1:20:45

normal design instead of putting like

1:20:47

confirm and continue buttons in the top

1:20:49

Left corner where no

1:20:51

other program ever placed them

1:20:54

Especially if you have a big screen where

1:20:55

you might not even see

1:20:56

that there's anything up there

1:20:57

Yeah, it's just going to be a big big

1:21:00

improvement and it's kind of needed

1:21:02

because Fedora currently like if you

1:21:04

install it three times

1:21:05

You know it works, but the first time you

1:21:07

are going to be very confused

1:21:09

Apparently installing Linux is not a big

1:21:12

issue these days if at least if I can

1:21:14

trust in my latest

1:21:15

community survey that I did

1:21:17

I think only 4% of people said that

1:21:19

installing Linux was a

1:21:20

major problem for them

1:21:21

So people seem to have solved that but

1:21:25

having a good installer is still pretty

1:21:27

nice and their new

1:21:28

installer will support Wayland now

1:21:30

It's it's a web application

1:21:32

So easy to maintain and easy to replace

1:21:34

or even to use on other distributions

1:21:36

It will support a better

1:21:38

remote desktop for installations

1:21:40

But yeah

1:21:41

The developers just do not feel like they

1:21:43

have the time to get that installer to a

1:21:45

state where it would offer

1:21:46

All the features that people are

1:21:49

expecting from the installer so it will

1:21:51

not land before 2025 for

1:21:53

Fedora 42 probably in April

1:21:56

It's not a big big problem and I call

1:21:59

that the current version

1:22:00

works. It's just very unintuitive

1:22:03

What feels really weird to me and the

1:22:06

development time isn't really weird

1:22:08

either because Ubuntu did the exact same

1:22:10

thing when they revamped

1:22:11

Their installer they announced it

1:22:12

They said hey look at what we've done and

1:22:14

then they took three years to release it

1:22:16

because yes making a stable

1:22:18

installer is not that easy

1:22:19

Which is why I don't understand why every

1:22:21

single distro feels like they have to

1:22:23

redevelop their own installer

1:22:25

Open SUSE is doing it right

1:22:27

now Fedora is doing it right now

1:22:30

Ubuntu did it like I think a year and a

1:22:32

half ago or a year ago. They started

1:22:34

using their own installer

1:22:35

We have Kalamares that works pretty well.

1:22:37

We have a lot of others

1:22:39

GNOME is working on their own installer

1:22:41

just for GNOME OS. Why do

1:22:43

we need so many installers?

1:22:45

Their goal is to grab either a system

1:22:47

image and unzip it or to grab a bunch of

1:22:50

packages and install them

1:22:51

We don't need

1:22:53

20,000 installers to do this thing and

1:22:55

the UI is exactly the

1:22:57

same for all of them

1:22:58

They are the same steps you choose an

1:23:00

internet connection you choose a user you

1:23:03

choose a keyboard layout

1:23:04

You choose a language and you choose a

1:23:07

partition scheme, and then you install

1:23:08

it's really not that difficult

1:23:10

I'm pretty sure people could unify all of

1:23:13

this because as much as I think

1:23:15

Fragmentation is a good thing for a lot

1:23:17

of projects for installers.

1:23:18

I really do not see the point

1:23:20

It's something you will

1:23:21

do once on your computer

1:23:23

And you will only do it again when you

1:23:26

change systems which technically should

1:23:27

not happen all that often

1:23:29

So why do we need that many installers? I

1:23:32

will never understand that

1:23:36

Now the Internet Archive is apparently

1:23:38

being heavily targeted by DDoS attacks

1:23:41

And they have been trying to fend these

1:23:44

off for a few days now

1:23:46

They haven't been able to identify the

1:23:47

source of that attack and the entire

1:23:50

database of the Internet

1:23:51

Archive is apparently safe

1:23:53

But the website is made

1:23:55

Unaccessible intermittently and it also

1:23:57

knocks off the Wayback Machine website

1:23:59

Which you probably know about it lets you

1:24:02

find old versions of specific websites

1:24:04

stuff that vanished off of the internet

1:24:06

And it's a really really useful

1:24:09

information conservation tool and it is

1:24:11

apparently a trend

1:24:12

these days for plenty of

1:24:15

public knowledge

1:24:16

Repositories to be attacked by these

1:24:19

types of attacks including the British

1:24:21

Library or the Berlin

1:24:22

Natural History Museum

1:24:23

Apparently some people think it's fun to

1:24:25

try and have less knowledge for humans

1:24:28

pretty pretty strange

1:24:30

behavior and

1:24:31

The Internet Archive took this

1:24:33

opportunity and the like the word of

1:24:35

mouth going around

1:24:36

saying that they were attacked

1:24:37

They took that opportunity to remind

1:24:39

their users that those DDoS attacks are

1:24:41

not really that alarming

1:24:43

Compared to other problems that they're

1:24:45

facing which is that they're being sued

1:24:47

by many US publishers

1:24:50

Because they claim that the Internet

1:24:52

Archive is infringing

1:24:53

on their copyright by

1:24:55

Preserving all the material and basically

1:24:57

functioning like a regular library

1:24:59

they host a bunch of content that has

1:25:02

been donated by users and

1:25:04

Just like a normal library and they offer

1:25:06

rentals of this content whether it's a

1:25:08

movie a book or whatever

1:25:10

Just like a normal library. You cannot

1:25:12

run the same thing 20,000 times at the

1:25:14

same time just like a normal library

1:25:16

But apparently US publishers thinks that

1:25:18

digital libraries are different than

1:25:20

physical libraries and they are attacking

1:25:22

the Internet Archive for this

1:25:23

If they lost that lawsuit, it would be an

1:25:26

absolute disgrace for human knowledge

1:25:28

They already lost one relatively

1:25:30

recently, which I think scrapped

1:25:33

500,000 books from their collection which

1:25:35

really sucks because some of those are

1:25:38

things that are not being

1:25:39

published or sold at all

1:25:40

Anymore meaning that there's one less way

1:25:43

to grab these it's the same problem with

1:25:44

video game conservation when something is

1:25:47

no longer sold or accessible

1:25:48

In any way, I think copyright should just

1:25:51

go away on those things because there's

1:25:53

basically no reason to keep it

1:25:54

Let people distribute what they need when

1:25:57

you're not making money off of it

1:25:58

I think that's fine, but apparently not

1:26:01

so yeah DDoS attacks and a

1:26:03

giant lawsuit is not good

1:26:04

The Wayback Machine and the Internet

1:26:06

Archive are really useful project for

1:26:09

scientific research and just for personal

1:26:11

knowledge and having them

1:26:12

Go off the map would really really suck

1:26:15

Now we're going to talk about

1:26:17

WSL the Windows subsystem for Linux some

1:26:20

of you might think

1:26:20

it's not related to Linux

1:26:21

But let me assure you it is

1:26:23

because it is running Linux

1:26:26

So Microsoft has announced a few things

1:26:28

for WSL that should

1:26:30

improve the experience first

1:26:32

They will automatically release some of

1:26:34

the memory used by WSL when it's no

1:26:37

longer under use for the

1:26:39

underlying Windows system

1:26:40

Which is interesting because I would have

1:26:42

thought that already was the case by

1:26:44

default because if not

1:26:46

It means that basically you were running

1:26:48

your WSL system. You were launching apps

1:26:50

It was grabbing more and more RAM and

1:26:52

then when you close those apps the RAM

1:26:54

stayed in WSL instead of being given back

1:26:56

to Windows, so you

1:26:58

probably had to close your WSL

1:27:01

System from time to time and reopen it.

1:27:04

It's weird. I don't know

1:27:05

They doesn't feel like it's been

1:27:06

developed that well, but yes short

1:27:08

But more importantly apart from that

1:27:10

Microsoft is bringing a graphical

1:27:12

settings app to configure WSL

1:27:15

Meaning that you will no

1:27:16

longer have to use a text file

1:27:19

Meaning that probably some Unix die-hard

1:27:21

fans will be even more mad

1:27:23

about the existence of WSL

1:27:25

Because now they're even moving away from

1:27:28

text-based configurations

1:27:29

Now I'm just joking you can still use

1:27:33

those text files to configure things

1:27:34

But you will get a graphical app to do

1:27:37

the exact same thing and

1:27:38

Windows users will also get a new

1:27:41

Environments feature that will let you

1:27:43

create manage and launch various

1:27:45

development environments

1:27:47

Probably sort of like a

1:27:48

virtual machine manager for WSL

1:27:50

So you could create an Arch Linux dev

1:27:53

environment a Ubuntu or Debian

1:27:54

environment and launch these

1:27:57

Indiscriminately from the same interface

1:27:59

probably a graphical thing way easier to

1:28:01

handle for a lot of people

1:28:03

And I know a lot of

1:28:04

people do not like WSL

1:28:06

They're afraid it will be detrimental to

1:28:08

Linux's growth in the long run

1:28:10

For now the data seems to point to the

1:28:12

fact it had zero impact

1:28:14

Linux is growing and

1:28:15

growing faster than it ever has

1:28:18

So WSL probably never

1:28:20

had an impact on that

1:28:21

I personally think WSL has the potential

1:28:24

to cement Linux's place as the leading

1:28:27

platform for developers

1:28:29

Right now if you want to develop

1:28:31

something in most domains,

1:28:32

you're better suited with Linux

1:28:34

It's going to be easier to install and

1:28:36

run your dev environment

1:28:38

But for some people running Linux on bare

1:28:40

metal is not an option

1:28:42

So having Linux available on Windows

1:28:44

means that people keep using Linux for

1:28:46

development or learn how

1:28:48

to use Linux for development

1:28:49

Instead of just using Windows because

1:28:51

that's what is installed on their PC and

1:28:53

trying to develop stuff on Windows

1:28:54

I think it's a net positive for Linux in

1:28:57

general, but we'll have

1:28:58

to see in the long run

1:29:01

Now Ubuntu finally released their long

1:29:03

announced version

1:29:04

using a real-time kernel

1:29:07

They're calling it

1:29:07

real-time Ubuntu 24.04 LTS

1:29:11

But it is not a separate distribution

1:29:14

despite its very long name

1:29:15

It's just Ubuntu 24.04 LTS with a patched

1:29:19

kernel that implements

1:29:21

the preempt_rt patch set

1:29:24

This is what lets the kernel handle

1:29:26

various operations in

1:29:27

a very predictable way

1:29:29

Which is what you need for a few specific

1:29:31

use cases if you want to learn more about

1:29:33

specific kernel versions

1:29:35

Including the real-time one

1:29:36

I made a video very recently on that

1:29:38

topic early this month or

1:29:39

at the end of last month

1:29:40

And it's it just tells you everything you

1:29:43

need to know about this

1:29:44

This release also apparently improves

1:29:46

compatibility for Ubuntu with the

1:29:48

Raspberry Pi 4 and 5 and

1:29:50

it makes them perform better

1:29:52

For real-time uses, but there is one

1:29:55

caveat to use this version

1:29:57

You need an Ubuntu Pro subscription and

1:30:00

it is free for individuals and for

1:30:02

small-scale companies

1:30:04

up to five computers

1:30:05

But you do need to create an account and

1:30:07

to register with Canonical to access and

1:30:10

create that subscription

1:30:11

Which is something that is a bit annoying

1:30:13

because if you just wanted to use

1:30:15

real-time Ubuntu and

1:30:16

not give Canonical an info

1:30:17

Well, you cannot it's not a deal-breaker

1:30:20

But it probably would have been better to

1:30:22

just offer that version as a regular

1:30:25

download or through a specific

1:30:27

repo that you could enable on any system

1:30:30

Still it's there it exists if you need a

1:30:32

real-time OS and you know Ubuntu

1:30:34

Well, at least you don't have to learn an

1:30:36

entirely new OS just to use it and it's

1:30:38

also not a bad option

1:30:40

Registering for that free subscription

1:30:42

will also give you longer LCS support

1:30:44

from five to ten years

1:30:45

if I remember correctly

1:30:46

So it is not that bad and it's just a few

1:30:50

details who create an account

1:30:51

I'm pretty sure you could use fake

1:30:53

information in a temporary

1:30:54

email if you really wanted to

1:30:57

And now we'll talk about operating

1:30:59

systems with two different systems. The

1:31:02

first one is an interesting one

1:31:03

It is not a Linux based

1:31:05

system. It's a free BSD based one

1:31:07

It's called Raven OS not Raven

1:31:10

It's a Y instead of the E and it's

1:31:13

something that I gave

1:31:14

a shot to a while back

1:31:16

Before realizing it was extremely far

1:31:18

from ready at that time and their new

1:31:20

release is still not

1:31:21

ready for most people

1:31:22

But it is still interesting because the

1:31:24

aim of Raven OS is to replicate

1:31:28

Mac OS's experience

1:31:29

as closely as possible

1:31:31

But it's not by using a tweaked KDE

1:31:33

version or a GNOME version

1:31:35

Which sort of looks like Mac OS but

1:31:38

doesn't really work like it and the theme

1:31:40

is just bad in a lot of areas

1:31:42

And the global menu doesn't work for

1:31:43

everything. No, they

1:31:44

don't want to do that

1:31:45

They are developing an entirely new

1:31:47

desktop and they also want to be able to

1:31:51

download and install Mac OS apps on

1:31:54

The system on Raven OS. So for now, it is

1:31:57

just a developer preview.

1:31:59

I think it's version 0.5

1:32:00

It's not even an alpha. It is described

1:32:02

as unstable and full of bugs

1:32:04

But you still get the very basics of a

1:32:07

Mac OS desktop. You get a global menu

1:32:09

You get a dog that works

1:32:11

they support the Kokoa APIs

1:32:13

Which are what is being used mostly to

1:32:15

build certain Mac OS apps and they will

1:32:17

apparently run most if not all free BSD

1:32:20

ports

1:32:21

they will run a lot of Linux apps through

1:32:23

the usual free BSD to Linux or Linux to

1:32:26

free BSD compatibility layer and

1:32:28

Mac OS apps are said to be

1:32:30

able to work in the future

1:32:32

They say it won't be

1:32:33

perfect compatibility

1:32:34

But they seem very confident that they

1:32:36

will be able to just let you download the

1:32:38

DMG and install the app and run it

1:32:41

So it's a very interesting project

1:32:43

I generally feel like these

1:32:46

sort of let's replicate Mac OS

1:32:48

systems tend to never succeed because

1:32:51

what people want from Mac OS is the

1:32:53

polish and the

1:32:54

smoothness and the aesthetics and

1:32:56

Generally, none of the systems trying to

1:32:58

replicate that really manage it. There's

1:33:01

a lot of really weird stuff

1:33:03

Maybe the default experience looks okay

1:33:05

But as soon as you start installing

1:33:06

something you immediately notice that

1:33:09

yeah, it's not made to look like that

1:33:11

It's not meant to resemble that it's not

1:33:13

working with the global menu or it's not

1:33:15

working with the dark

1:33:16

or it's just not Mac OS

1:33:18

It's a system tweaked to look like Mac OS

1:33:20

and so this will never satisfy

1:33:21

any person looking for Mac OS

1:33:24

But in the Linux world

1:33:25

maybe something that completely

1:33:27

replicates from scratch the desktop

1:33:29

environment of Mac OS might be able to

1:33:31

satisfy those users and

1:33:33

If they can manage to

1:33:34

actually run Mac OS apps on free BSD

1:33:37

then this would be a very very solid

1:33:40

thing and this could

1:33:41

probably convert a few people and

1:33:43

Honestly, this could also probably be

1:33:44

adapted as a layer to any other BSD or

1:33:47

maybe even Linux based systems

1:33:49

Which would be really really cool now?

1:33:52

the only real big issue here is that most

1:33:54

good Mac OS apps are paid for and

1:33:57

And so I don't know what

1:33:59

they're gonna do about this

1:34:00

Because well you would have to have a

1:34:02

solid compatibility list to make sure

1:34:04

that the app you just pay ten bucks for

1:34:06

Actually runs instead of buying it and

1:34:08

noticing that it doesn't or just not

1:34:11

being able to buy it

1:34:12

at all because it comes

1:34:13

From the Mac App Store and this you

1:34:15

probably will never be

1:34:16

able to run on Raven OS

1:34:17

So interesting project kind of kind of

1:34:20

skeptical about their chances, but still

1:34:22

I will follow it because it's fun

1:34:25

And the second operating system I wanted

1:34:28

to talk about here is Rhino Linux

1:34:30

You probably heard about it in the past

1:34:32

It's a rolling release version of Ubuntu,

1:34:34

but it's not really Ubuntu

1:34:36

They changed the entire desktop for

1:34:38

something called unicorn

1:34:39

Which is based on XFCE and they want you

1:34:42

to be able to install

1:34:42

basically any app from any source

1:34:45

And this this through had been put on po

1:34:47

on pause and on hold because well there

1:34:50

was a bit of developer burnout

1:34:52

Tensions ran high apparently people were

1:34:54

not agreeing on the rhythm of development

1:34:57

And so basically they stopped working on

1:35:00

it for a while and they've just now

1:35:01

Reorganized around a few community

1:35:03

guidelines and more healthy development

1:35:05

practices and they released Rhino Linux

1:35:09

2024.1 this is still a rolling release it

1:35:11

still comes with its own packaging tool

1:35:13

You can still install

1:35:14

like packages from Ubuntu

1:35:16

Packstall flat hub or snap this update is

1:35:19

minimal it only updates pack

1:35:22

stall to its latest version

1:35:23

It's kind of like the AUR for Ubuntu

1:35:25

based distros if you don't know it also

1:35:27

comes with the kernel 6.9

1:35:30

But apparently it's sort of a buggy

1:35:32

version in certain areas

1:35:34

Because the rebasing on the latest

1:35:36

version of XFCE broke a

1:35:38

few things that they built

1:35:39

Notably their global menu and so it's

1:35:41

been hard coded in terms of length

1:35:43

So it might actually spill out of your

1:35:46

monitor and you will have to fix that

1:35:47

manually in a CSS file

1:35:49

Which isn't really all that great. I'm

1:35:52

really only mentioning Rhino Linux here

1:35:54

just because it really outlines the fact

1:35:58

that open source projects and operating

1:36:00

systems are not companies mostly their

1:36:02

groups of people who

1:36:04

invest themselves to the maximum on their

1:36:06

project for a while and then they can

1:36:09

decide it's too much and then they can

1:36:10

Reorganize they can leave they can stop

1:36:12

they can resume they can change and it's

1:36:14

always nice to keep that

1:36:16

in mind when judging or

1:36:17

Using an open source tool or a Linux

1:36:20

distribution just because it feels

1:36:22

polished and it's a finished product that

1:36:24

lets you do your work

1:36:24

Every day doesn't mean that it's made by

1:36:27

a giant company with tons of money

1:36:29

Does it has it doesn't mean that it has

1:36:31

financial support that other capable

1:36:33

systems might enjoy?

1:36:35

I personally tend to forget that from

1:36:37

time to time because our stuff is

1:36:39

generally very very good

1:36:41

But some from time to time it's nice to

1:36:43

remember that behind all of these

1:36:45

projects that we use every day

1:36:46

They are just human sometimes just one

1:36:48

human sometimes two

1:36:49

or three sometimes tens

1:36:51

But they are doing this in their free

1:36:52

time for the most part

1:36:54

And so yeah problems can happen and I

1:36:56

think the Rhino Linux

1:36:57

example is a is a solid one

1:36:59

People got super

1:37:00

enthusiastic working on this thing

1:37:01

They really tried to rewrite things three

1:37:03

times in a row because they had a new

1:37:05

idea and at some point

1:37:06

They just burnt out and this meant that

1:37:08

if you use Rhino

1:37:09

Linux as your main system

1:37:10

You were left in the dust for like six to

1:37:12

eight months, which is a feel bad

1:37:15

But instead of judging the people making

1:37:17

the OS we can all

1:37:18

remember that hey, you know what?

1:37:20

They're just humans and it's sort of

1:37:22

normal for humans to burn out and stop

1:37:24

making those projects

1:37:25

It I just wanted to outline this because

1:37:28

that's something I tend to

1:37:29

forget myself all the time

1:37:33

Okay, and let's conclude this episode by

1:37:35

talking about the steam

1:37:37

deck the steam deck passed

1:37:39

15,000 games that are officially marked

1:37:41

as being playable on the steam deck

1:37:45

10,100 have the official playable label

1:37:48

meaning that they work on the steam deck

1:37:50

But some elements might be a little bit

1:37:51

too tiny or you need to change the

1:37:53

default settings or

1:37:54

maybe controller input is

1:37:55

not perfect, but it

1:37:57

definitely works and is playable and

1:37:59

4900 games are officially verified

1:38:01

meaning that they are

1:38:02

perfect on the steam deck

1:38:04

There are also 4,000 games being marked

1:38:06

as unsupported and if you don't use a

1:38:09

steam deck and you

1:38:09

just use a Linux computer

1:38:11

If it's a verified game for the deck

1:38:13

You will install and play it with no

1:38:15

issue on any Linux computer if it's

1:38:18

marked as playable on the deck

1:38:19

Generally, you will have nothing to do to

1:38:21

play it on a normal Linux computer

1:38:23

And if it's marked as

1:38:24

unsupported some of them will work

1:38:26

Because they can be marked as unsupported

1:38:28

because they don't support controller

1:38:30

input or they don't support the

1:38:31

resolution of the deck

1:38:33

But some of them are marked as

1:38:35

unsupported because they just flat out

1:38:36

don't run on Linux at all because of

1:38:38

anti-cheat or other things

1:38:39

So your experience may vary but basically

1:38:42

that's 15,000 games

1:38:43

playable on the steam deck

1:38:44

That's probably closer to like 17 18,000

1:38:49

steam games playable on a Linux computer

1:38:52

Recently verified titles for the deck

1:38:54

include rogue trader something that I

1:38:56

absolutely want to play and

1:38:57

maybe that's the opportunity

1:38:59

To get my steam deck out from its

1:39:01

cupboard because I love this type of

1:39:03

game, but I was really

1:39:06

Uninvested and underwhelmed with Baldur's

1:39:08

Gate 3 setting the game was

1:39:11

Insanely good all the mechanics the

1:39:14

options everything was fantastic

1:39:16

But that generic fantasy setting just

1:39:19

doesn't do it for me. It is boring to me

1:39:22

I much prefer science fiction and I much

1:39:24

prefer the 40k universe to anything that

1:39:27

is Tolkien based or

1:39:29

Dungeons and Dragons based

1:39:30

So while I will probably never finish

1:39:32

Baldur's Gate 3 because I just

1:39:34

Cannot bring myself to do it because I'm

1:39:36

entirely uninvested in

1:39:37

the story or the characters

1:39:39

Warhammer 40k rogue trader seems a lot

1:39:41

more like my gem and

1:39:43

around the steam deck

1:39:44

The data still seems to show that it's

1:39:46

selling like hotcakes

1:39:48

It is consistently in the top three or

1:39:50

top five sellers on Steam

1:39:53

Along with games. It's in the top five

1:39:56

best-selling games on

1:39:57

Steam, which is insane

1:39:59

And that's been going on since the

1:40:01

beginning of the year

1:40:02

meaning that it probably sells

1:40:04

multiple tens of thousands of units every

1:40:06

week if you compare it to how many units

1:40:09

the games in the top three or top five

1:40:11

Of Steam actually sell that's a really

1:40:13

really good thing for Linux gaming

1:40:15

The more people use and own a steam deck

1:40:18

the more developers will focus on

1:40:20

supporting it and the

1:40:22

more games will run on Linux

1:40:23

In general, so I will admit I personally

1:40:26

have not used my own

1:40:28

steam deck in a long time

1:40:29

But that's mostly because I haven't

1:40:31

really traveled a lot or at all recently

1:40:33

I haven't been gaming much at all

1:40:36

My time has been consumed by building

1:40:38

painting and playing with my Warhammer

1:40:41

40k miniatures and armies

1:40:43

Gaming has taken a big backseat recently,

1:40:45

but honestly with rogue trader being

1:40:47

supported it just

1:40:48

sparked my interest again

1:40:49

I will probably swing

1:40:50

back to gaming at some point

1:40:52

I guess and honestly seeing the steam

1:40:55

deck perform so well is really nice

1:40:57

It's just a great little device great

1:40:59

console and it's helping Linux immensely

1:41:03

So props to valve with that. They're a

1:41:05

company. They're not

1:41:06

doing this to be our friends

1:41:07

They're doing this because that's where

1:41:09

the thing they will make the make the

1:41:10

most money and keep their sort of

1:41:12

monopoly on the gaming market

1:41:14

On PC for longer, but it still helps us

1:41:17

in the short run at least

1:41:19

so I'm not going to complain

1:41:21

Okay, so this will conclude today's

1:41:23

episode or this week's episode

1:41:25

I hope you enjoyed listening to it even

1:41:27

you though you might not

1:41:29

agree with a lot of the opinions

1:41:30

I expressed in there. I hope you enjoyed

1:41:32

So if you want to dive

1:41:34

deeper into any of those topics

1:41:35

You know where to go the show notes you

1:41:37

have all the links that I use if you want

1:41:39

me to keep making this show

1:41:40

You also have links in the show notes

1:41:42

right at the top that will let you

1:41:44

support it and get access to a daily

1:41:46

Version of this show if you

1:41:48

become a patreon at any tier

1:41:50

So thanks for listening, and I guess you

1:41:52

will hear me in the

1:41:53

next one next week. Bye